NJ Supreme Court: Gays Have Equal Right to Marriage Benefits, But Not to the Word “Marriage
Brian Zick
Llyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog reports: The New Jersey Supreme Court, relying on the state constitution, ruled on Wednesday that the state must provide same-sex couples the "same rights and benefits" that opposite-sex couples have under state marriage laws. The court split 4-3 in ruling that gay couples do not have a right to marriage, leaving that open as an option for the legislature to enact.
Here is the court's statement of its holding: "Denying committed same-sex couples the financial and social benefits and privileges given to their married heterosexual counterparts bears no substantial relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose. The Court holds that under equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and benefits enjoyed by opposite-sex couples under the civil marriage statutes. The name to be given to the statutory scheme that provides full rights and benefits to same-sex couples, whether marriage or some other term, is a matter left to the democratic process."
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
