Dan Froomkin at WaPo provides a compendium on pardonmania.
Personally, I think Patrick Fitzgerald, not being brain dead, took on his assignment as Special Counsel knowing full well from day one that a pardon would be a potential factor in his prosecutorial equation. And because he is good at his job, and mindful of the experience of Lawrence Walsh, he prepared for the possibility. And simply because a President has the power to grant a pardon does not mean that it couldn't be construed as a complicit act to further obstruct justice.
George Bush is foremost a coward, and I dare say he doesn't want to risk putting himself in legal jeopardy. Especially if he might have to contend with Patrick Fitzgerald.
Just pulling speculation outta my ass, but I wouldn't be surprised if Fitz already had a little conversation with Bush's attorney, Jim Sharp, to have him alert his client to the legal pitfalls of a pardon for Libby.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
