Publisher’s Notes

Bob Burnett

When Bush, Cheney and the conservative ideologues pontificate on the American appetite for energy as an indicator of rational self-interest, they are defending a business lifestyle” – one dominated by the marketplace values of winner take all” and live for today.” But we can choose not to be energy gluttons. We can choose another lifestyle – one that emphasizes sustainability. To provide a reasoned response to the energy crisis, progressives need to champion their alternative lifestyle.

Conventional American political commentary identifies ideology along a one-dimensional spectrum: left, center and right. By definition, the far-left and the far-right are extremes, and the center is moderate. But this simplistic typology doesn’t adequately describe politics in the United States – where behavior is multi-dimensional, and the triangle, not the straight line, is a more apt representation. 

Recent demographic studies have identified three distinct American lifestyles. In their book The Cultural Creatives: How 50,000,000 People Are Changing the World, Paul Ray and Sherry Anderson describe contemporary society as composed of traditionals” (25 percent), moderns” (49 percent) and cultural creatives” (26 percent). 

Traditionals are social conservatives who live in the patriarchal, religious, rural, xenophobic, rules-based family system associated with the pre-’60s American family. Their moral code is traditional or family-values centered. The church is their dominant form of social organization. Christian conservatives can be placed in this category. 

In a second corner of the contemporary political spectrum are the moderns, the denizens of consumer society. Their moral code is marketplace values – urban, cynical, hedonistic and short-term in perspective. The corporation is their dominant form of social organization. From a media perspective, modernism is the values system that dominates most of American culture. 

Ray and Anderson divide the moderns into four sub groups: economic conservatives” who are well-off represent 6 percent – these are the winners in the winner-take-all morality. The second cluster is conventional moderns” – folks who subscribe to marketplace values but haven’t grabbed the brass ring (12 percent). The third subgroup is the striving center” – those who are upwardly mobile and religiously conservative, mostly people of color (14 percent). The fourth cluster is alienated moderns” who reject all of the above in terms of values and worldviews” (17 percent). Angry white males” can be found in this latter category. 

In the third corner of the American political triangle, Ray and Anderson place the cultural creatives,” a catch-all category for people whose values are other than social and economic conservatism. Their examples are primarily environmentalists and feminists (60 percent of cultural creatives are women) with a New Age twist. Their moral code features supportive, nurturing relationships within the framework of community. Contemporary progressives can be seen as occupying this vaguely defined niche. As the book suggests, being a progressive is perhaps best defined as someone who is neither a social nor economic conservative. 

When voters self-identify as conservatives (40 percent), they are either social conservatives from within the traditional lifestyle or economic conservatives from within the modern/​business lifestyle. Political independents come from within the third and fourth subgroups of moderns (strivers or alienated) or they are cultural creatives who do not identify themselves as liberal” or progressive.” This last group of independents are the most likely prospects to join a revitalized progressive coalition. 

To win them over we need to convey a viable alternative to the culture of marketplace values. We need to clarify our values and emphasize what we are for rather than what we are against – tying these values to specific policy issues. In my next column, I will argue that the energy crisis provides an opportunity to do so.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Bob Burnett is a writer in Berkeley, Calif., and Quaker activist. He can be reached at bobburnett@​comcast.​net.
Democratic Rep. Summer Lee, who at the time was a candidate for the state House, at a demonstration in Pittsburgh for Antwon Rose, who was killed by police, in 2018. Lee recently defeated her 2024 primary challenger.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.