Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion in Georgia v Randolph. Rookie Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a critical dissent.
SCOTUSblog has links to the majority opinion, concurrences and dissents
The decision narrowed the circumstances under which police authorities can enter and search a home without a warrant. The case arose in a domestic dispute situation, wherein the husband refused search permission and the wife gave permission to police.
David Stout, in The New York Times report on the decision, called attention to Roberts' grievance, and Souter's cold smackdown:
And alluding to the chief justice's complaint that the majority did not address what would happen if there were a third household occupant involved, Justice Souter said, "We decide the case before us, not a different one."
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Announcing In These Times’ New Agreement with the National Writers Union
Freelance contributors are essential to the quality and success of In These Times and independent media, and this agreement is one way to demonstrate their value to our publication and our commitment to transparency.
For more information about the National Writers Union, visit nwu.org.
Read the full agreement, which reaffirms a floor for the rates of our freelance editorial content, as well as our current rates (which are higher) and submissions guidelines below.