Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion in Georgia v Randolph. Rookie Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a critical dissent.
SCOTUSblog has links to the majority opinion, concurrences and dissents
The decision narrowed the circumstances under which police authorities can enter and search a home without a warrant. The case arose in a domestic dispute situation, wherein the husband refused search permission and the wife gave permission to police.
David Stout, in The New York Times report on the decision, called attention to Roberts' grievance, and Souter's cold smackdown:
And alluding to the chief justice's complaint that the majority did not address what would happen if there were a third household occupant involved, Justice Souter said, "We decide the case before us, not a different one."
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Similar articles
ViewpointCulture
Big Back Panic: Fatphobia's Rebrand
Anti-fatness is back with a vengeance so aggressive it puts 1990s “heroin chic” to shame.
Tee Noir
FeatureInvestigationGoodman Institute
How Europe Outsourced Border Enforcement to Africa
The European Union is militarizing Africa's internal borders to curb migration, with little regard for human rights.
Andrei Popoviciu
FeatureInvestigationGoodman InstituteEn Español
Europa Está Externalizando su Represión Transfronteriza a África
La Unión Europea está militarizando las fronteras internas de África para frenar la migración.
Andrei Popoviciu