Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion in Georgia v Randolph. Rookie Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a critical dissent.
SCOTUSblog has links to the majority opinion, concurrences and dissents
The decision narrowed the circumstances under which police authorities can enter and search a home without a warrant. The case arose in a domestic dispute situation, wherein the husband refused search permission and the wife gave permission to police.
David Stout, in The New York Times report on the decision, called attention to Roberts' grievance, and Souter's cold smackdown:
And alluding to the chief justice's complaint that the majority did not address what would happen if there were a third household occupant involved, Justice Souter said, "We decide the case before us, not a different one."
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Sign up for our free newsletter and get all of the most important In These Times stories about labor, politics, Gaza, culture, the far-right and so much more in your inbox once each week.
You'll also get our investigations, like the recently-published "U.S. Jewish Institutions Are Purging Their Staffs of Anti-Zionists" and "The Death Squads Hunting Environmental Defenders."
Thanks for supporting independent media!