Texas Court Unanimously Rejects Bush Claim of Authority

Brian Zick

Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog reports In a sharp rebuff of a claim of presidential power, Texas' highest state criminal court ruled on Wednesday that President Bush did not have the constitutional authority to tell state courts to apply a decision of the World Court on the rights of foreign nationals arrested and prosecuted in the U.S. "We hold," the Texas Court of Criminals Appeals said, "that the President has exceeded his constitutional authority by intruding into the independent powers of the judiciary." Relying on the two-century-old doctrine that it is the duty of the courts "to say what the law is," the state court said that power includes interpretation of treaties. "The clear import of this is that the President cannot dictate to the judiciary what law to apply or how to interpret the applicable law."

Please consider supporting our work.

I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.

Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.

Illustrated cover of Gaza issue. Illustration shows an illustrated representation of Gaza, sohwing crowded buildings surrounded by a wall on three sides. Above the buildings is the sun, with light shining down. Above the sun is a white bird. Text below the city says: All Eyes on Gaza
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.