Candidate Bush trumpeted the academic progress of students under a reform regime built on a single standardized test, the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills. Not only were test-scores leaping upward but the “achievement gap” between students of color and their white counterparts was disappearing. This remarkable accomplishment was dubbed the “Texas Miracle,” not merely an important piece of Bush’s electoral strategy, but the phenomenon that catapulted Rod Paige, Houston’s school superintendent, to the Bush cabinet as Secretary of Education.
But like so many of Bush’s claims, the “Texas Miracle” turned out to be both extravagant and false. In June 2003 the Texas Education Agency discovered a pattern of rampant undercounting of dropouts, dramatic overestimations of college-bound graduates and falsified reports concerning crimes in schools. Test scores were inflated, successes wildly exaggerated, failure swept into the broom closet.
This is worth noting now because in his State of the Union message, President Bush vowed to stay the course: “We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals,” he exulted, highlighting the centerpiece of his signature education law: the No Child Left Behind Act. He deemed his critics timid defenders of the status quo who favor “weakening standards and accountability” and announced that “the days of simply shuffling children along from grade to grade without them learning the basics” are over.
The tragedy is that the Bush policy distracts from a more hopeful path to genuine school improvement. If we are committed to free high-quality public schooling available to all we should campaign for a comprehensive program of change. Equity cannot be the goal. Equity must be the starting point.
It is no mystery why a high school in the suburbs that can raise $15,000 per child on its tax base, and spends even more, does better than a high school on the South Side of Chicago that can raise only $7,000 per child. The inequitable distribution of educational resources is a dagger at the heart of schooling in a democracy.
We don’t need any more threats or punishments; we need support for teachers, families, students and communities in their efforts to set and meet high standards. With its high-stakes testing, No Child Left Behind functions more as an autopsy than a diagnostic.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
