The New York Times tried to play a "gotcha" on Ned Lamont, by making his recent criticisms of Joe Lieberman's 1998 Senate floor rebuke of President Clinton appear to be a hypocritical contradiction of what Lamont said at the time, in a letter sent to Lieberman. The Times quoted passages from the letter. But somehow managed to leave unmentioned all the parts which show that Lamont has been entirely consistent - pretty much verbatim consistent.
Atrios posts a copy of Lamont's actual letter, which expressed then precisely the same complaint Lamont recently voiced.
(Atrios' archive link has some page display trouble which is interfering (on my browser) with the image of the letter jpeg, so it might be better to go to the site's main page.)
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Similar articles
ViewpointCulture
Big Back Panic: Fatphobia's Rebrand
Anti-fatness is back with a vengeance so aggressive it puts 1990s “heroin chic” to shame.
Tee Noir
FeatureInvestigationGoodman Institute
How Europe Outsourced Border Enforcement to Africa
The European Union is militarizing Africa's internal borders to curb migration, with little regard for human rights.
Andrei Popoviciu
FeatureInvestigationGoodman InstituteEn Español
Europa Está Externalizando su Represión Transfronteriza a África
La Unión Europea está militarizando las fronteras internas de África para frenar la migración.
Andrei Popoviciu