Toyota Wages PR Battle With Workers

Richard Greenwald

Toyota Motor Corporation President and CEO Akio Toyoda (L) and Toyota Motor North Ameica CEO Yoshiumi Inaba (R) testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Capitol Hill February 24, 2010.

Yesterday, Toyota was on Capital Hill trying to both explain its actions and lobby Congress to go easy. The day was filled with high-level executives being grilled, creating camera-ready moments for the media.

We all know that the issue is unintended acceleration.” The company has recalled 8 million cars, suspended sales and is trying to limit future damage. To do so, it is using everything in its vast arsenal, including its workers.

Yesterday, as Toyota executives were testifying before congress, Toyota workers complete with crisp company uniforms and from 40 different U.S. manufacturing centers, lobbied their congressional representatives and gave interviews to the media.

The message was clear: Toyota was a good community citizen, provided good jobs and workers were worried about what might happen to both the company and their job.

There is nothing new in having a firm’s workers lobby. On many levels, it is smart PR. Workers are the every man or woman,” they represent families and American values and more importantly, they are not the faceless international that is business today.

I do not want to question these workers’ motives, as I am sure they were sincerely worried about their future. But it worries me that a firm such as Toyota would, when desperately pushed to the wall, resorts to using workers (the image of workers at least) to curry favor on the Hill.

It reminded of me how often firms like Toyota have historically cloaked themselves in workers’ garb to seem real, knowable and good citizens when they needed that image. But as soon as it served their purpose, they turn their back on the very workers they are now looking at to save them.

Did you know?

Many nonprofits have seen a big dip in support in the first part of 2021, and here at In These Times, donation income has fallen by more than 20% compared to last year. For a lean publication like ours, a drop in support like that is a big deal.

After everything that happened in 2020, we don't blame anyone for wanting to take a break from the news. But the underlying causes of the overlapping crises that occurred last year remain, and we are not out of the woods yet. The good news is that progressive media is now more influential and important than ever—but we have a very small window to make change.

At a moment when so much is at stake, having access to independent, informed political journalism is critical. To help get In These Times back on track, we’ve set a goal to bring in 500 new donors by July 31. Will you be one of them?

Richard Greenwald is a labor historian and social critic. . His essays have appeared in In These Times, The Progressive, The Wall Street Journal among others. He is currently writing a book on the rise of freelancing and is co-editing a book on the future of work for The New Press, which features essays from the county’s leading labor scholars and public intellectuals.
Subscribe and Save 66%

Less than $1.67 an issue

Here's how you can help

In These Times is funded entirely by readers like you, but through the first half of 2021, reader donations are down 20% compared to last year. If that continues, it could spell real trouble for In These Times. We’re running a short fundraising drive (from now until July 31) to get things back on track. Will you chip in?