The AP reports on financial disclosure forms released yesterday for top White House aides, headlining the story "White House Gift Disclosures Include a Shotgun for Rove." The account enumerates assets of various prominent names, with totals specified in each case in a numerical spread, ie. "Rove's disclosure for 2005 revealed he is worth between $1.8 million and $6.9 million."
That to me seems like a mighty large margin for guesstimate, but with the fluidity in value of stocks and extra homes, I suppose, it makes sense that a specific number can't be precisely pinned down (even if I think a proper financial disclosure should be a tad less uncertain).
But this I can't figure at all:
"Joel D. Kaplan, the former deputy White House budget director who is now a deputy chief of staff, listed $60,000 to $115,000 in law school loans and reported that he took out a nine-month loan in 2005 to buy an engagement ring worth $15,000 to $50,000."
What exactly was the price tag on the damn ring? Was it $15,000? Or was it $50,000? How much exactly was the loan? Did he pay $15,000 at the jewelry store and then tell his insurance company it's worth $50,000? Is Joel Kaplan such a big celebrity that items he owns have gained an inflated value as the result? How does an engagement ring have a value so imprecise that the margin for asset valuation error is $35,000?
I surely betray my ignorance about such matters, but what's up with that?
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick