Old adversaries make a new bid for power.
The war that bin Laden wants.
Behind the Burka
Afghan women who fight the Taliban.
Humanitarian aid has become a weapon of war.
The terrorist money trail leads back to Midland, Texas.
Congress is making the economy worse.
Why the Democrats will get trounced in 2002.
A New Peace Movement?
Should the government be allowed to hold immigrants on "classified" charges?
Citibank attacks money-laundering regulations.
Immigration reform is derailed by attacks.
Coal Miners' Slaughter
Could an Alabama disaster have been prevented?
Time Is Tight
The cutoff is starting for welfare recipients.
FILM: Take a left turn at Mulholland Drive.
Shakespeare at the Barricades
BOOKS: Insurrections in the mind.
Trading on Terrorism.
Give War A Chance
TAKING THE BAIT
Bush is giving bin Laden the war he wants
In bombing Afghanistan, George W. Bush has handed Osama bin Laden a major victory. The strategic aim of the terrorists who struck the United States was to provoke Washington and its Western allies into sending planes and missiles against a lightly armed, utterly impoverished Muslim countrywhich already had the lowest caloric intake per person in the world, and where one in four children die before the age of fiveand then use the ensuing outrage to portray the conflict as a new crusade against Islam.
The ultimate goal of the terrorists always has been to destabilize the corrupt regimes of the Muslim world, beginning with Saudi Arabia and including Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan and, yes, Yasser Arafats Palestinian Authority. A vast gulf separates the leaders of these regimes from their oppressed and penurious peoples, among whom primitive radical Islamist fundamentalism has been metastasizing at an alarming rate. The United States has reacted to September 11 just as bin Laden and his ilk hoped it would: Bush has given the radical mullahs a new weapon with which to inflame the Muslim street.
That the United States has dropped packaged meals with its bombs is a morally sickening joke. There are more than 5 million men, women and children starving in Afghanistan (not to mention another hungry 4 million in refugee camps), so 37,000 MREs a day is an airdrop in the bucket; high-altitude food drops are impossibly inaccurate and may not get to those who need them (may, indeed, be resupplying the Taliban); and the last time the United States dropped food from 30,000 feeton the luckless Kurds in Northern Iraq a decade agothe velocity of the packages was so great that they killed a number of their intended recipients. U.S. bombing increased Afghan famine by ending the U.N. food convoys over land. So while Bushs grand humanitarian gesture may make Americans feel less guilty about the collateral damage to civilians, no one in the Muslim world is fooled.
Our governing elites have learned little from our recent history. It was Bill Clintons launching of cruise missiles against bin Laden and his hosts that elevated this odious illuminé to hero status for many of the Muslim worlds dispossessed and those educated, middle-class fanatics who feed on their anger and distress. Each bomb dropped on Afghanistana country already in ruins after decades of invasion and civil warrecruits hundreds of new terrorists. By militarizing the campaign against terrorism, the United States has only confirmed the Manichean worldview so prevalent in much of Islam today.
This view is that America has an overarching strategy including control of oil and gas in Central Asia, destruction of the Iraqi regime, consolidation of Americas grip on the Persian Gulf oiligarchies, and encroachment on Chinese and Russian spheres of influence. As Middle East scholar Farwaz Gerges wrote on the New York Times op-ed page after returning from a Beirut conference on how Arabs and Muslims should respond to the anti-terrorist campaign: Many Muslims suspected the Bush administration of hoping to exploit this tragedy to settle old scores and assert American hegemony in the world.
The United States has already notified the United Nations that we may take military action against other countries in the campaign against terrorism. It has not escaped notice in the Muslim world that this administration is chock full of those who advocate a new war against Saddam Husseins Iraq. (A 1998 open letter by Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others now in charge of American foreign policy called for precisely that.) And there are many in the Arab street who assume that a new war to eliminate Saddam is, in Bushthink, Daddys unfinished business. Moreover, there have been disturbing leaks from the Bushies that could presage an even greater escalation of the warlike the administration official who told the New York Times that the anti-terrorist campaign will fail if it doesnt also target Iran and Libya.
In their blinkered nationalism, Americans cannot comprehend how all this appears to a wide swath of the Muslim masses, and so are aghast at the anti-U.S., pro-bin Laden riots that broke out after the bombing of Afghanistan, including a firefight between Islamist radicals and Palestinian Authority forces in Gaza. (If Ariel Sharonwhose hard line is now being disowned by a raft of American Jewish community leaders and businessmanfinds Arafat unpalatable as an interlocutor, wait until he gets a look at his successor.)
Just as the world has taken its first, sometimes faltering steps toward the genuine rule of international law with the war-crimes trials of Slobodan Milosevic and his henchmen, as well as Rwandan perpetrators of genocide, the United States has squandered an unparalleled opportunity to turn the worldwide horror at the slaughter of innocents on September 11 into concrete steps to extend laws global reach. By militarizing what is essentially a planetary law enforcement problem, Bush has undermined the goal of eliminating the hydra-headed terrorist networks. The bombing of Afghanistan is an enormous setback for the rule of law in the world. Escalations of this sort will only further exacerbate and fertilize the conditions in which terrorism flourishes.