Today is Giving Tuesday, the single biggest day of giving for nonprofits. Once you've finished reading this story, please consider making a tax-deductible donation this Giving Tuesday to support this work.
Dear ITT Ideologist,
As the nation’s incoming secretary of defense, I’m seeking counsel from all quarters to assure that our global strategic posture remains erect. My question to you is the same one recently posed by my predecessor, Robert Gates: How do we deal with the failure of our NATO allies to take threats more seriously by buying our weapons and joining our wars?
– Leon Panetta, Washington, D.C.
Dear Secretary Panetta,
I too was dismayed when NATO sloughed off warnings by both Presidents Bush and Obama that Iran’s prospective missiles posed a proleptic danger to Iceland. Likewise, NATO’s out-of-hand dismissal of CIA secret intelligence on the Bolivian menace to Denmark all but made me heartsick.
The problem is that Europeans are obliged by their socialistic governments to take month-long vacations. Many sign up for package tours to countries we rank as evil and aggressive. Thus it’s hard for them to feel fear and animus for those nations – except, of course, if they suffered bed bugs or some tourist scam. Americans, on the other hand, rarely travel beyond the local mall or shooting range. It’s simple as pie to drive them to nail-biting anxiety about exotically named lands and remote tribes. Since it’s easier to keep the ignorant ignorant than make the aware oblivious, I fear there is no good answer to NATO’s danger deficiency.
Dear ITT Ideologist,
I see that in addition to granting himself the personal prerogatives of offing individuals by way of assassination and nations by way of war, President Obama has permitted the FBI to dig into the private lives of humdrum as well as hot-headed citizens. Ours being a throwaway economy, the Feds have also been given leave to rifle through our rubbish. I was hoping you might come up with a way to protect the privacy of our poubelles.
– Dennis Dross, Jetsam, Mo.
Dear Mr. Dross,
As you probably know, American political life is limited to three groupings: Democrats, Republicans and those subject to surveillance. Obama’s directive to the FBI acknowledges that the first two are waning while the latter is waxing. As revulsion rises at the stink of the politics of Business by the Reps and As Usual by the Dems, Obama and company want a tighter watch on the increasing numbers of citizens who are getting tired of merely holding their noses. So the Feds will be parsing more of our pixels and digging through our detritus. While you need hacking skills to protect yourself from the former, a simple shredder should guard you from the latter – at least until Obama bans shredders for obstructing injustice.
Today is the single biggest day of the year for giving to nonprofits—last year, individual donors collectively gave more than $2.5 billion to nonprofit organizations in the U.S. alone on Giving Tuesday.
Giving Tuesday began nearly a decade ago as a way to harness the power of collective giving and highlight the important work of nonprofit organizations. For In These Times, being a nonprofit is more than just a financial model. It is central to our very mission.
The traditional, for-profit news model was built on a foundation of corporate ad dollars. From the beginning, this has been a devil’s bargain that limits what can be published by corporate media outlets and inevitably warps what they do print. In These Times is not beholden to any corporate interest.
Who are we beholden to? You—our community of readers. Support from readers allows In These Times to maintain our independence and speak truth to power. It is how we are able to continue publishing the stories readers—like you—want to read, and the voices that need to be heard in this political moment.