Painting the Red States Red

Gun control is wildly popular in places like Louisiana--but you wouldn’t know that from the media.

David Sirota

Cleopatra Cowley, mother of gun-violence victim Hadiya Pendleton, speaks with a crowd of supporters at a Mayors Against Illegal Gun Violence meeting earlier this year. (Congressman Brad Schneider / Flickr / Creative Commons)

As social media accelerates the velocity of political news, fact-free stereotypes and reductionist shorthand are increasingly substituted for accuracy and nuance. Coastal blue states are now typically presented in the national press as one giant Berkeley campus while heartland red states are portrayed as a confederacy of Dukes of Hazzard” sets. In this cartoonish mythology, liberals are all Birkenstock-clad socialists, conservatives are all Boss Hoggs — and politics is a perpetual conflict between these two warring tribes.

A March poll by Schoen LLC found that 84 percent of voters in the red state of Arkansas support background check legislation.

The trouble, of course, is that the folklore has a diminishing connection to reality. Case in point is the narrative that now defines the Washington debate over gun control.

This week, in a piece summarizing that narrative, Time magazine’s White House correspondent Michael Scherer asserted that television ads pressuring lawmakers to support background check legislation will harm Democratic politicians who represent Republican-leaning states. About the ads, Scherer asked: Is it better to teach wavering Democrats that there is a cost to voting against gun control, even if it jeopardizes Democratic control of the Senate, which is needed to enact gun control?” 

In this case, the fact-free mythology promoted the stereotype that claims all conservatives are gun extremists. From that stereotype came Times assumption that most conservative voters automatically oppose mandated background checks for gun purchases, and that therefore those voters will punish Democratic senators who support background checks. The assumption, in other words, is that there are only two sides to the gun debate, and that rank-and-file conservative voters are uniformly against all firearm regulations, no matter how modest those regulations are.

What’s amazing — and horrifying — is that this kind of schlock is considered serious analysis in Washington, despite concrete facts proving it false. 

For instance, months before Times article, a March poll by Schoen LLC found that 84 percent of voters in the red state of Arkansas support background check legislation. 

Likewise, a May survey by Public Policy Polling found that Democratic incumbents in the red states of North Carolina and Louisiana helped their cause for re-election with their recent votes in support of background checks.” More specifically, the survey found 70 percent of voters in each of their states support such checks” and also found that the incumbents’ constituents say they’re more likely to vote for them next year because of their votes.” These results were subsequently corroborated in PPP’s follow-up polls in Arkansas, Georgia and Tennessee.

This dissonance between the manufactured story and the clear reality of gun politics exemplifies a larger dynamic. On issue after issue, reporters, pundits and politicians in Washington increasingly tell themselves stories about America that simply aren’t true. Those fairy tales often pretend the nation is far more conservative than it actually is — and that has serious negative consequences.

For example, as I’ve previously reported, the fairly tales are likely why the University of California’s recent nationwide survey of lawmakers found that conservative politicians systematically believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are … while liberal politicians also typically overestimate their constituents’ conservatism.” 

Similarly, the fairy tales tend to cast majoritarian legislation like the background check bill as politically impossible, which in turn becomes self-fulfilling conventional wisdom in Washington. The ensuing gridlock consequently fuels the crisis of legitimacy now seen in the polls — the one in which more and more Americans now say the government doesn’t understand or care about the rest of the country.

Washington, no doubt, writes that disillusionment off. The ruling political and media class probably tells itself it is just because Americans are dumb. But, as always, the real story is the converse: It is because Americans are smart — and getting smarter.

Please consider supporting our work.

I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.

Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.

David Sirota is an awardwinning investigative journalist and an In These Times senior editor. He served as speech writer for Bernie Sanders’ 2020 campaign. Follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.
Illustrated cover of Gaza issue. Illustration shows an illustrated representation of Gaza, sohwing crowded buildings surrounded by a wall on three sides. Above the buildings is the sun, with light shining down. Above the sun is a white bird. Text below the city says: All Eyes on Gaza
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.