The Age of Maintenance

How should England care for its elderly population?

Jane Miller

(Photo by David Boyle)

Easily my favourite old-age statistic has it that if most of us can look forward to living for about 10 years longer than our parents, we can also expect to spend the equivalent of eight of those years in hospitals or doctors’ waiting rooms, maintaining ourselves. That’s a loose approximation, of course, but it offers a sense of what it is to be old these days. And if you add to that all those exercises people recommend we perform at least 10 times a day, and the walking and the swimming and the procuring and cooking of only the greenest and healthiest food, we’re pretty much back where our parents were. We are even advised to do crosswords in what must surely be futile efforts to ward off Alzheimer’s. We could easily spend every minute of those additional 10 years simply managing to stay alive.

What does woman want? Freud asked, rhetorically and a little petulantly. And woman,” you notice, not women.” So, what does old want? Well, we certainly don’t all want the same things, though efforts to mollify us or garner our votes tend to suggest that we do. I suppose most of us want some company and some independence. We get free bus passes and television licences in this country, and a little help with our fuel bills. The recent granny tax,” introduced in the last budget, freezes the tax allowance for the old, which used to rise each year in line with inflation. It doesn’t affect those too poor to pay taxes and it means virtually nothing to anyone in possession of an above-average income. But the group in between will be unfairly deprived of exactly what gave them some security against rising costs.

A recent report commissioned by the Conservative government, but dropped from any immediate legislative plans, describes the provision of care for the neediest pensioners and those in the middle as broken,” and maintains that hundreds of thousands of old people are living in misery and fear” because of the cuts in funding and of uncertainty about the future.

At a recent conference in North London, convened by several organizations promoting the interests of the old, the message was clear: More than anything, the old would like their health and welfare problems dealt with under one roof and preferably by the same people. They are exhausted by going from doctor to hospital to offices that deal with housing, with care, with pensions, with tax issues. Simply merging health and welfare services would cut down on the waiting. It might also mean that some doctors and nurses and administrators would be trained and experienced in considering us as a whole, not just as feet or bladders or necks or, indeed, minds. Accompanying an ill friend to a consultant surgeon the other day, we were both moved to tears when the doctor asked him what work he had done before he retired, and then a further question about that work. Those are rare questions.

There are disastrous plans afoot to reform” the National Health Service just at the point when there has been a marked and acknowledged improvement in most aspects of healthcare and, especially, in the reduction of delays to treatment. Choice” is the buzzword. The Health Service is to be opened to private bidders of all kinds, and the chances of standards being maintained, let alone improved, look slim indeed. It is not even clear that these reforms” will save money, but they will put money in the pockets of some private providers. Care for the old, whether in their own homes or in residential homes, is funded inadequately and separately from health, and this government, like previous ones over the last 20 years, has done no more than wring its hands at the prospect of a swelling population of centenarians, with no plans to do anything about it.

So what does this old woman want? First, I’d like a center for the old, run mostly by old people, which offers us advice of all kinds. Then, I’d like a young unemployed person versed in technology (as any such person is likely to be), to visit me regularly and teach me to deal with my computer and my newly digitalised television set. Finally, I’m afraid I’d like the Olympics to be over, so that London can return to its shabby self instead of being in a state of perpetual, traffic-stopping renovation.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Jane Miller lives in London, and is the author, most recently, of In My Own Time: Thoughts and Afterthoughts (2016), a collection of her In These Times columns and interviews.
Democratic Rep. Summer Lee, who at the time was a candidate for the state House, at a demonstration in Pittsburgh for Antwon Rose, who was killed by police, in 2018. Lee recently defeated her 2024 primary challenger.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.