Win a trip to Cascais, Portugal!

Kick off the In These Times 47th anniversary celebration in style: Get your raffle tickets, for a chance to win a trip for two to Cascais, Portugal!

9/11 and the Illusion of War Without Casualties

Twenty years ago, Naomi Klein wrote that 9/11 shattered Americans’ “illusion of war without casualties.” Now, after combat troops have been pulled out of Afghanistan, is it really “game over”?

In These Times Editors

U.S. Army soldiers fire illumination artillery rounds from a 105mm Howitzer at Forward Operating Base (FOB) Shank on April 7, 2014 near Pul-e Alam, Afghanistan. Getty Images

The latest issue of In These Times is a special, extra-length issue devoted entirely to the subject of socialism in America today. This special issue is available now. Order your copy today.

Prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, In These Times contributing editor Naomi Klein wrote that the U.S. has become [an] expert in the art of sanitizing and dehumanizing acts of war committed elsewhere.” Twenty years on, the forever war” — which former President George W. Bush declared would be won swiftly (“it may take a year or two, but we will prevail”) — has cost more than 241,000 lives and trillions of dollars. President Joe Biden withdrew all combat troops on August 31, formally ending the longest war in U.S. history. 


Now is the time in the game of war when we dehumanize our enemies. They are utterly incomprehensible, their acts unimaginable, their motivations senseless. They are madmen” and their states are rogue.” …
Feeling people will no doubt object to this characterization: War is not a game. It is real lives ripped in half; it is lost sons, daughters, mothers and fathers, each with a dignified story. … 
It’s true: War is most emphatically not a game. And perhaps it will never again be treated as one. Perhaps September 11, 2001 will mark the end of the shameful era of the video game war. … 
Since the Gulf War, American foreign policy has been based on a single brutal fiction: that the U.S. military can intervene in conflicts around the world — in Iraq, Kosovo, Israel — without suffering any U.S. casualties. This is a country that has come to believe in the ultimate oxymoron: a safe war. 
The safe war logic is, of course, based on the technological ability to wage a war exclusively from the air. But it also relies on the deep conviction that no one would dare mess with the United States — the one remaining superpower— on its own soil. 
This conviction has, until [9/11], allowed Americans to remain blithely unaffected by — even uninterested in — international conflicts in which they are key protagonists. Americans don’t get daily coverage on CNN of the ongoing bombings in Iraq, nor are they treated to human interest stories on the devastating effects of economic sanctions on that country’s children. … Domestically, war is no longer a national obsession, it’s a business that is now largely outsourced to experts. This is one of the country’s many paradoxes: though the engine of globalization around the world, the nation has never been more inward looking, less worldly. 
No wonder [9/11], in addition to being horrifying beyond description, has the added horror of seeming, to many Americans, to have arrived entirely out of the blue. … 
Did the United States deserve to be attacked? Of course not. … But here’s a different question that must be asked: Did U.S. foreign policy create the conditions in which such twisted logic could flourish, a war not so much on U.S. imperialism but on perceived U.S. imperviousness? 
The era of the video game war in which the U.S. is always at the controls has produced a blinding rage in many parts of the world … in which twisted revenge-seekers make no other demand than that American citizens share their pain. …
Since [9/11] … the illusion of war without casualties has been forever shattered. 
A blinking message is up on our collective video game console: Game Over.
Win a trip for two to Cascais, Portugal!

Celebrate 47 years of In These Times in style! Get your raffle tickets today for your chance to win a vacation for two to Cascais, Portugal!

One lucky raffle winner will receive a $3,000 gift card to cover the costs of two flights, as well as a stay in a 5-star boutique hotel, housed in a 17th century fortress with medieval architecture and décor. You can schedule the trip on your timeline!

All raffle ticket sales support ongoing In These Times reporting, just like the article you just finished reading. Get your raffle tickets now.

The winner will be selected on the night of September 30, at the In These Times 47th Anniversary Celebration. You do not need to be present at the drawing to win.

Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.