Win a trip to Cascais, Portugal!

Kick off the In These Times 47th anniversary celebration in style: Get your raffle tickets, for a chance to win a trip for two to Cascais, Portugal!

Vermont Legislature: Bring Them Home Now

The state with the highest per capita deaths demands an end to the war in Iraq

Terry J. Allen

The latest issue of In These Times is a special, extra-length issue devoted entirely to the subject of socialism in America today. This special issue is available now. Order your copy today.

MONTPELIER, VT. – The state that has lost the most troops per capita became the first to pass a resolution calling on Congress and the president to immediately withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq.

Opponents of the resolution hammered the 'wrong message' theme, but none mentioned support for the president, or defended the wisdom and legitimacy of the war.

On Feb. 13, the ghosts of war linked Vermont’s snow-covered hills to a bloodied and foreign land. Many of the lawmakers, seated in a tight horseshoe under a high white arch, invoked their personal connection to wars – one decades done and another currently raging thousands of miles away. Both sides of the heated but decorous debate argued that their position best supported the troops, some of whom were their close relatives.

A group of Iraq veterans, looking terribly young next to the legislators, sat at the front of chamber on red-velvet backed chairs; the mother of another Iraq vet suffering post-traumatic stress syndrome sat with them. They were introduced to a round of applause during which a few legislators remained seated and silent.

I did not mean disrespect,” said Rep. Joseph Krawczyk, who sat with his hands on his lap during the applause. The bearded and craggy Republican was a career soldier and is a Vietnam War veteran with a daughter on her third tour in Iraq. I know from personal experience the effect of a message like this [can have] on our armed forces. … The words say, We can’t win.’ “

Matt Howard, a former Marine corporal in Iraq, read the 95-52 vote differently. The message is aimed at our country and the federal government,” said the Vermonter after watching the debate. The people on the ground know the reality of the situation. They know what’s going on and they know the policy has failed. And they know that their presence is inflaming the insurgency.”

While opponents of the resolution hammered the wrong message” theme, none mentioned support for the president, or defended the wisdom and legitimacy of the war. 

Proponents of withdrawal touched on the economic and geopolitical costs of a failed policy. But they emphasized, as Democratic Rep. Sue Minter put it, The best way to support the troops was to bring them home from countries where they are seen as occupiers not liberators as they were promised.”

While in Vietnam, I and many others in my unit wanted to go home as soon as possible because our mission goals were undefined,” said Democratic Rep. John Zenie. We hoped that protests at home would lead to our going home. … I wish that more people would have protested sooner back then so that I and my fellow soldiers could have come home even if one day sooner.” 

The debate belied Vermont’s reputation as a liberal monolith. While the legislature is currently controlled by Democrats, the governor is a Republican and public opinion is sharply divided over civil unions, taxation, land use and, of course, the war.

In a nod to coming together” politics, some Democrats voted to delete the strongest passage in the withdrawal resolution: The presence of American troops in Iraq has not, and will not, contribute to the stability of that nation, the region, or the security of Americans at home or abroad.” 

While the deletion was pure politics for some, it made all the difference to Republican Rep. Patricia O’Donnell, whose son is serving in Iraq. O’Donnell at first opposed the call for an immediate and orderly withdrawal. I know what it is like to hate this war,” she said, to hear of casualties and think, please, don’t let it be my son and to feel relief when the military does not knock on my door, and then the guilt knowing it was someone else’s son.”

After the compromise language passed, she became one of two Republicans to cross party lines and join the call for bringing the troops, and her son, home.

Win a trip for two to Cascais, Portugal!

Celebrate 47 years of In These Times in style! Get your raffle tickets today for your chance to win a vacation for two to Cascais, Portugal!

One lucky raffle winner will receive a $3,000 gift card to cover the costs of two flights, as well as a stay in a 5-star boutique hotel, housed in a 17th century fortress with medieval architecture and décor. You can schedule the trip on your timeline!

All raffle ticket sales support ongoing In These Times reporting, just like the article you just finished reading. Get your raffle tickets now.

The winner will be selected on the night of September 30, at the In These Times 47th Anniversary Celebration. You do not need to be present at the drawing to win.

Terry J. Allen is a veteran investigative reporter/​editor who has covered local and international politics and health and science issues. Her work has appeared in the Guardian, Boston Globe, Times Argus, Harper’s, the Nation​.com, Salon​.com, and New Scientist . She has been an editor at Amnesty International, In These Times , and Cor​p​watch​.com. She is also a photographer. Her portraits of people sitting in some of the 1900 cars lined up outside a Newport, Vt., food drop can be seen on www​.flickr​.com/​p​h​o​t​o​s​/​t​e​r​r​y​a​l​l​e​n​/​a​lbums. Terry can be contacted at tallen@​igc.​org or through www​.ter​ry​jallen​.com.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.