Taiwanese Workers Battle AIG Over $437M Pension Fund

Lindsay Beyerstein

A man walks past the Taiwan Nan Shan Life Insurance building, a subsidiary of the troubled global insurance giant American International Group (AIG), in Taipei.

We wanted to make sure you didn't miss the announcement of our new Sustainer program. Once you've finished reading, take a moment to check out the new program, as well as all the benefits of becoming a Sustainer.

Insurance agents at Nan Shan Life of Taiwan scored a preliminary victory in their battle to retain control of their pension funds when the company changes ownership.

Disgraced insurance giant AIG is trying to auction off Nan Shan, Taiwan’s second largest life insurer.

Last week, Nan Shan’s union said it would not rule out a strike to safeguard its pension plan.

The union’s 36,000 members want to stop AIG from treating the $437 million pension fund as an asset of Nan Shan to be sold off to the highest bidder.

The union says that the fund is not AIGs to sell. When a company pays into a worker’s pension fund, that money belongs to the person who earned it. The union is making its case to the public in front page newspaper ads.

Taiwan’s top financial regulator gave the union a preliminary victory this week when he ruled that the pension dispute must be settled before Nan Shan can change hands.

Nan Shan management announced on Thursday that it was willing to jointly manage the fund with the union, but the union wants the money back. Nan Shan says only AIG can make that call. AIG has reportedly hired consultants to look into the matter.

About a dozen firms have submitted bids to buy Nan Shan, but only about half that number are still in contention. The financial press is reporting that the uncertainty surrounding the pension fund is causing some bidders to reconsider how much the company is worth to them.

So, AIG might not get as much for Nan Shan as it initially hoped. The financial press is reporting this like it’s some kind of tragedy, but it’s really just the market at work. A company with binding obligations really is worth less than a company that’s free and clear. Pension obligations are serious business. If buyers hoped to raid Nan Shan’s pension fund, they may be sorely disappointed — but the company’s insurance agents won’t be.

Be a Sustainer

We surveyed thousands of readers and asked what they would like to see in a monthly giving program. Now, for the first time, we're offering three different levels of support, with rewards at each level, including a magazine subscription, books, tote bags, events and more—all starting at less than 17 cents a day. Check out the new Sustainer program.

Lindsay Beyerstein is an award-winning investigative journalist and In These Times staff writer who writes the blog Duly Noted. Her stories have appeared in Newsweek, Salon, Slate, The Nation, Ms. Magazine, and other publications. Her photographs have been published in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times’ City Room. She also blogs at The Hillman Blog (http://​www​.hill​man​foun​da​tion​.org/​h​i​l​l​m​a​nblog), a publication of the Sidney Hillman Foundation, a non-profit that honors journalism in the public interest.
Subscribe and Save 66%

Less than $1.67 an issue