Trusting the Press Less

Lindsay Beyerstein

Freshly printed copies of the San Francisco Chronicle roll off the printing press at one of the Chronicle's printing facilities in San Francisco, Calif. Newspaper sales continue to slide as people turn to the Internet and television for news. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

In the wake of Watergate, 70% of Americans said they trusted the press a great deal” or at least a fair amount.” Today, only about 44% of us report at least a fair amount of trust in the press today. What changed? Jay Rosen of Pressthink explores eight hypotheses.

The first hypothesis is that Americans have become more cynical across the board. Rosen notes that Americans’ trust in the church, the banks, the public schools, and the presidency also plummeted during the same period.

Rosen sees a paradox: Americans learn about the failures of other instutitions through the media. So, you’d think that confidence in the press would go up as the media exposed more social rot.

I’m not sure there’s a paradox. The biggest failure of the press in recent memory was the uncritical coverage of Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction. The press credulously reported the Bush administration’s version of events. Sure, the media eventually reported that no WMDs had been found, but that revelation didn’t inspire confidence in the government or the media.

Rosen’s second hypothesis is that journalism scandals and trashy tabloid outlets are to blame. In that case, people may not trust the media” at large, but they might still trust certain prized sources of news.

I would add that the more diverse the media landscape, and the more aware the public is of alternative sources of news, the more difficult it is to trust the media” as a whole. Outlets will contradict each other. Some of them must be wrong. On this view, declining trust in the press could be a good thing if readers are thinking more critically about the news. On the other hand, it could mean that people are seeking out media that pander to their pre-existing biases – call it the Fox News effect.

I won’t list all the hypotheses here, but I encourage you to read Rosen’s piece. Definitely food for thought. He argues that all the standard theories of the trust gap – from journalism scandals to working the refs” – have some merit, but that even taken to together, they don’t seem like enough to account for the massive decline. Rosen suspects the full answer has something to do with the professionalization of journalism.

SPECIAL DEAL: Subscribe to our award-winning print magazine, a publication Bernie Sanders calls "unapologetically on the side of social and economic justice," for just $1 an issue! That means you'll get 10 issues a year for $9.95.

Lindsay Beyerstein is an award-winning investigative journalist and In These Times staff writer who writes the blog Duly Noted. Her stories have appeared in Newsweek, Salon, Slate, The Nation, Ms. Magazine, and other publications. Her photographs have been published in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times’ City Room. She also blogs at The Hillman Blog (http://​www​.hill​man​foun​da​tion​.org/​h​i​l​l​m​a​nblog), a publication of the Sidney Hillman Foundation, a non-profit that honors journalism in the public interest.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.