Standard Issues

Craig Aaron

When Bill Kristol, Fred Barnes and John Podhoretz set out to start a new magazine, they had plenty of money – thanks to Rupert Murdoch – and plenty of political momentum, thanks to the Republican revolution” that had recently returned the House to Republican control for the first time in 40 years. But they didn’t have a title. The American Standard seemed to strike the right chord of patriotism and infallibility, until someone mentioned that was also the name of a leading brand of toilets.

Thus was born the Weekly Standard, which debuted in September 1995 with a cover showing Newt Gingrich packing an Uzi under the headline Permanent Offense.” This wasn’t the last time the editors would be wrong, of course. But the early reviews were mostly positive. Even In These Times, in an article by Tom Frank, praised the new magazine for avoiding the intellectual trappings of the old loony right” and not descending into the lunkheaded ogreness that so many expected.”

The Weekly Standard was marketed to inside-the-Beltway power brokers and the conservative intelligentsia. It introduced a new roster of talented, provocative writers like Christopher Caldwell, Andrew Ferguson and Matt Labash, which almost atoned for launching the careers of David Brooks and Tucker Carlson.

Conservatives were returning from the wilderness, and the Weekly Standard was going to lead them in rebuilding Washington, D.C., as the New Jerusalem,” Frank wrote in that same In These Times article (back before What’s the Matter with Kansas?” had become a punch line on The Daily Show”). The attitude befit a publication for conservatives who were in power, not just backwoods cranks.”

Even then the Standard was hard to stomach, with its constant railing against liberal” bogeymen and its thundering editorials about the sanctity of the family and the market.” How quaint the sniping of the culture wars” seems now that the Standard has helped to foment the real thing.

The Standards 1997 cover story, Saddam Must Go,” by Kristol and Robert Kagan, is widely credited with planting the seeds for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. After 9/11, the Standard–amplified by the megaphone of Murdoch’s media empire – started pointing the finger at Iraq. (On the very afternoon of the terrorist attacks, Kristol told NPR, I think Iraq is, actually, the big unspoken sort of elephant in the room today.”) And as late as November 2003, the Standard was still pushing a Saddam – Al Qaeda connection on its cover (headline: Case Closed”).

That’s a lot of fodder for the Standards 10th anniversary issue, which asked a number of longtime contributors to ponder the following question: On what issue or issues (if any!) have you changed your mind in the last 10 years – and why?” But for the most part, the Standard-bearers are staying the course.

Kagan – wondering what happened to all his fellow warmongers – scolds them with a quote from Thucydides: I am the same man and do not alter, it is you who change, since in fact you took my advice while unhurt, and waited for misfortune to repent of it.” (Kagan, though, overlooked the opening line of the quoted passage: For those of course who have a free choice in the matter and whose fortunes are not at stake, war is the greatest of follies.”)

In general, humility at the Standard is in short supply. One thing I changed my mind about in the last 10 years is the Democrats’ future,” Noemie Emery writes. Ten years ago, I believed that they had one.”

In the entire 13-page section, only Andrew Ferguson really questions the direction of the conservative movement. He bemoans the ease in which stalwarts” like Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed and Grover Norquist comandeered the greasy machinery of Washington power. Conservative activists came to Washington to do good and stayed to do well. The grease rubbed off, too.”

Needless to say, the Standard crowd is doing pretty well themselves. On September 14, almost exactly four years after President Bush’s famous speech amid the rubble of the World Trade Center, the Standard threw a star-studded (Katharine Harris! Bob Novak! Joe Lieberman!) anniversary bash. President Bush was speaking in New Orleans that night, trying to salvage his presidency from a deserted Jackson Square lit up like Disneyland. That same day was the bloodiest in Baghdad since the end of major combat operations” – more than a dozen bombs exploded in the city, killing 160 people and wounding 570.

The Standards soiree was emblematic of the entire Bush era. While the conservative elite was nibbling lobster tails and sipping champagne, the rest of the world – from the Bayou to Baghdad – was going down the toilet.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Craig Aaron is senior program director of the national media reform group Free Press and a former managing editor of In These Times.
The War on Protest Cover
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.